File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on La Trobe and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
A short note on the Chisholm paradox
conference contribution
posted on 2020-12-10, 01:35 authored by Guido Governatori© 2020 CEUR-WS. All rights reserved. We advance an alternative version of the Chisholm Paradox and we argue that the alternative version (while logically equivalent to the original version), in its manifestation in the natural language, is not intuitively consistent. The alternative version of the paradox suggests some requirements for deontic logics designed for legal reasoning.
History
Publication Date
2020-01-01Proceedings
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on MIning and REasoning with Legal textsEditors
Casini G Di Caro L Governatori G Leone V Markovich RPublisher
CEUR-WS.orgPlace of publication
SpainVolume
2632Pagination
7p.ISSN
1613-0073Name of conference
Workshop on `MIning and REasoning with Legal texts (MIREL) (2019)Location
Madrid, SpainStarting Date
2019-12-11Finshing Date
2019-12-11Rights Statement
The Author reserves all moral rights over the deposited text and must be credited if any re-use occurs. Documents deposited in OPAL are the Open Access versions of outputs published elsewhere. Changes resulting from the publishing process may therefore not be reflected in this document. The final published version may be obtained via the publisher’s DOI. Please note that additional copyright and access restrictions may apply to the published version.Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC