La Trobe
- No file added yet -

Archaeology and the Anthropocene in the Study of Settler Australia

Download (817.69 kB)
chapter
posted on 2024-01-08, 03:39 authored by Susan LawrenceSusan Lawrence, Peter DaviesPeter Davies
Environmental archaeology of settler colonialism in Australia is well placed to make an important contribution to our understanding of the Anthropocene. Environmental data provide perspectives on settler-driven change and places it in the long-term context of anthropogenic change that began with the arrival of Aboriginal people some 65,000 years ago. Historical archaeology is uniquely placed to interpret this record. It has the capacity to integrate scientific data about the environment with humanities-based understandings about culture and human agency. It also has the capacity to interrogate multi-scalar data about human activity ranging from the site-specific to the global and extending from the present into deep time. This chapter reviews the work of archaeologists using environmental data and the work of natural scientists producing data about environmental change over the past two centuries. Included in this is work on soil erosion and sedimentation as well as floral and faunal research. It is argued that research which more closely integrates archaeological approaches with environmental science has considerable potential to provide insights into anthropogenic environmental change and into human adaptation to the changes caused.

History

Publication Date

2018-01-01

Book Title

Historical Archaeology and Environment

Editors

de Souza M Costa D

Publisher

Springer

Place of publication

Cham, Switzerland

Pagination

23p. (p. 229-251)

ISBN-13

9783319908571

Rights Statement

© the Authors 2023 . This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (see here: https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/self-archiving-and-license-to-publish#terms-for-use), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-019-00515-w